Insolvent trading laws to change amid COVID-19 crisis

March 23, 2020 Roger Blow

The Federal Government has announced urgent changes to insolvent trading laws to provide companies with the confidence to continue to trade during the Covid-19 crisis that currently grips the world.

One key change is to temporarily relieve directors, for six months, of the risk of being held personally liable for insolvent trading by the company.

Others include a 10 times increase to the minimum debt amount necessary to seek the winding up of an insolvent company (from $2,000 up to $20,000) and pushing out the period to satisfy any statutory demand from 21 days to 6 months. These are significant and vital amendments given that almost overnight we have seen widespread and deeply damaging developments across almost all markets and sectors.

The ATO has also released information on temporary arrangements (including tax rebates and deferred payments) being introduced to respond to the economic crisis and new Government economic measures are being announced almost daily to try and preserve jobs and allow companies to ride out the storm.

Legal, accounting and financial advisors are needing to update their advice on a daily basis as new measures are announced and new impacts are felt from the virus measures.

Cove Legal provide specialist advice to clients facing possible insolvency outcomes or facing actual or threatened ATO debt action. If you are attempting to address director personal liability issues or an insolvency situation generally, either now or in the future, do get in contact as we would love to try and help.

https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/insolvency-law-to-be-changed-as-avalanche-expected-20200322-p54con

Roger Blow, Principal, P: +61 8 6381 0326 or E: roger@covelegal.com.au

This publication is not intended to provide and does not provide legal advice. You should seek professional legal advice relating to your specific situation(s) before taking any action based upon its contents.

The ATO's model litigant obligations

July 18, 2019 Roger Blow

With the ATO’s debt recovery powers again coming under fire in the press for being excessive, what rights does a small business have when the way the ATO handles its claims and litigation is considered to be contrary to its obligations as a ‘model litigant’?

The model litigant rules, or model litigant obligations, are guidelines for how a government body ought to behave before, during, and after litigation.[1] The ATO, like any other Commonwealth agency, is subject to model litigant obligations and has an obligation to:

act with complete propriety, fairly and in accordance with the highest professional standards in handling claims and litigation. This also requires that the ATO not start legal proceedings unless it is satisfied that litigation is the most suitable method to resolve a dispute. [2]

In Shord v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 167 Justice Logan discussed at length the role of the Commissioner and how he is to conduct proceedings to which he is a party. His Honour made the following comments with respect to model litigant obligations:

The ‘standard of fair play to be observed by the Crown in dealing with subjects’ in litigious business, termed the duty to act as a model litigant, antedates and, if anything, is more onerous than the duty which all parties and their lawyers have in proceedings before this Court to assist in the achieving of the ‘overarching purpose’ of facilitating the just resolution of disputes according to law and as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible: s 37M and s 37N, Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). [3]

His Honour went on to say:

Departures from model litigant behaviour can, in particular circumstances, constitute professional misconduct, a contempt of court or an attempt, contrary to s 43 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), to pervert the course of justice. [4]

However, it has also been confirmed by the Courts that an alleged failure on the part of a Commonwealth Agency to act in accordance with its obligations does not exist in Australian law as a distinct cause of action. As a result, such failures (aside from a potential complaint to the Attorney General) can only be actioned via a request that the Agency pay the legal costs within existing proceedings, that it can be argued arise from the breach(es) of those obligations.

Cove Legal offers specialist expertise in the area of tax disputes and insolvency. We represent clients in Court winding up applications and bankruptcy petitions and provide strategic advice on ATO payment plans and all other aspects of ATO debt recovery action (such as director penalty notices, garnishee notices, freezing orders, default assessments, audit requests and ATO criminal prosecutions).

Roger Blow, Principal, Ph: +61 8 6381 0327 or roger@covelegal.com.au

[1] https://www.ruleoflaw.org.au/priorities/model-litigant-rules/

[2] https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Dispute-or-object-to-an-ATO-decision/In-detail/Avoiding-and-resolving-disputes/Litigation/Litigation---our-policies/

[3] Shord v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 167 at [169].

[4] Ibid at [174].

Changes to Director Penalty Notices

July 4, 2019 Roger Blow

Since April 2019 there has been an important change to the Director Penalty Notice (DPN) regime in relation to a Director’s personal liability for an unpaid Superannuation Guarantee (SG) debt.

A Director will now be personally liable if a company’s SG liabilities are not remitted within 28 days of the end of each quarter. Previously a Director had 3 months to report their superannuation and settle the debt without the risk that the ATO would issue a lockdown DPN.

A Director who fails to lodge SG returns within the 28 day time period will cause the ATO to issue a lockdown DPN, which makes the Director automatically liable for those specific debts and prevents them from escaping liability via a liquidation/administration.

Directors should note that these changes do not alter the 3 month period allowed for the settlement of a company’s PAYG debt.

Cove Legal are experts in assisting clients with contentious tax matters and insolvency proceedings. We provide advice on ATO payment plans, director penalty notices, winders and all other aspects of ATO debt recovery action. Practice Director Roger Blow has acted extensively on behalf of the ATO in Perth and has specific expertise in tax related disputes.

Roger Blow P: +61 8 6381 0326 or e: roger@covelegal.com.au

New Director ID laws proposed

April 11, 2019 Roger Blow

It is being proposed that all existing and future directors of registered corporations be required to apply for a permanent identification number which will keep track of their various directorships.

The Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries Modernisation and Other Measures) Bill 2019 proposes amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 making it compulsory for all newly appointed directors to apply for a unique Director Identification Number (DIN) within 28 days of becoming a director. For existing directors, it is proposed that there will be transitional provisions giving a currently appointed director 15 months to apply for a DIN once the new requirement commences. Those considering becoming a director within 12 months could also apply for a DIN.

With the current system, directors are only required to lodge their details with ASIC but there is no process in place to verify their identity. The new requirements will improve the traceability of a director’s relationship across all companies and allow the regulators to quickly investigate a director’s involvement in what may be repeated unlawful activity, in particular illegal phoenixing.

There will be civil and criminal penalties introduced for directors who do not have a DIN or that fail to apply for a DIN within the applicable timeframe. A director also commits an offence if they knowingly apply for multiple DIN’s or misrepresent a DIN to a registered body or government agency.

Whilst the draft legislation was introduced to Parliament in February, experts recommend that companies prepare for its enactment. We will keep you updated on its progress.

Cove Legal provides legal advice on a wide range of commercial issues. We specialise in dispute work, but Principal Roger Blow’s 20+ years working in some of the largest commercial law firms allows us to address a wide range of client legal needs with fee structures that are tailored to the commercial issues being addressed. Give us a no-obligation call to see if we can help.

Roger Blow

P: +61 8 6381 0326 or e: roger@covelegal.com.au